Knowledge on traditional Fulbe health systems and indigenous practices: implications for intergenerational learning and future health aspirations.

Abstract

The need to provide a comprehensive repository of indigenous health knowledge, practices, and seeking behaviour within a just transition and intergenerational learning framework augment the generation of empirical data from various segments of identified Fulbe communities. This paper examines the relationship between indigenous health knowledge and practices and their implications on intergenerational learning and future health aspirations. Using a mixed approach, data generated from 650 respondents in selected communities in Southern Ghana was examined. The demographic characteristics, and perceived effectiveness, and access to contemporary health systems were analysed using descriptive tools. Further, Cronbach alpha values of 0.799 involving 4 measured items and 0.674 involving 5 measured Likert scale items were established for the independent and dependent variables respectively. Thus, proving an internal consistency of the measured items for Fulbe health indigenous knowledge and practices (0.799) and future health aspirations (0.674). A multiple linear regression analysis examining factors influencing future health aspirations in Fulbe communities was conducted. Among educational levels, tertiary education was positively associated with future health aspirations (β = 0.261, p = 0.030). Place of residence indicated that peri-urban residence was positively associated with future health aspirations (β = 0.268, p < 0.001), while rural residence was marginally significant (β = 0.122, p = 0.073). Regarding origin, respondents from Burkina Faso (β = 0.213, p = 0.005), Niger (β = 0.204, p = 0.019), and those reporting the same nationality (β = 0.531, p < 0.001), as well as “other” origins (β = 0.461, p = 0.007), showed statistically significant positive associations. Migration generation also showed significant associations, with second-generation (β = -0.229, p = 0.003) and third-generation respondents (β = -0.283, p < 0.001) having lower coefficients compared to first-generation respondents.

The significant relationship between the socio-demographic variables and future health aspirations as linked to improved health outcomes and health seeking behaviour necessitate the documentation, transmission of indigenous health knowledge, and complementary implementation of sustainable health practices in Fulbe communities to sustain intergenerational learning and enhance future health aspirations.

Background

Knowledge transmission in migrant communities is influenced by indigenous knowledge, practice, and behaviour in both destination and source areas (Kohsaka and Rogel., 2021; Head, Klocker, and Aguirre-Bielschowsky, 2019). As the world moves towards a desire for an equitable and just community, it is important to provide a repository of knowledge related to the totality of factors that influence intergenerational learning and future aspiration of migrant communities. Looking at the dearth of knowledge in indigenous knowledge on traditional health practices and their implication on future health practices in marginalized Fulbe communities (Finn, Herne, and Castille, D., 2017; Konadu, 2007; Thompson, and Fulton, 2024; Kalu, 2022), the structural linkages between the social determinants of health in Fulbe community settings need to be examined.

Studies have shown that there is an inextricable linkage between health and community development. The nexus is established in the individual, household, and communal dimensions. What is then required is the examination of the relationships, interdependences, and apparent variations in health choices, and aspiration in areas where pluralistic health care delivery systems exist. Crucial in this study context is the intergenerational nature of the Fulbe migrant communities, their enculturation, and efforts to maintain their cultural identity and practices within the source area, and how these impacts on their existing health conditions and future health desires.

Whereas social and demographic variables have been postulated in theories and models such as the Health Belief Model, Plan Behaviour Theory of Plan Behaviour and Community Action Cycle as major constituents of individual and communal actions toward health, their levels of effect and roles may vary based on the context, and mode of knowledge transition, and intergenerational learning, especially in a migration and settlement context.

It has been proven that Fulbe cultural systems of pastoral nomadism has socio-religious and economic dimensions that affects livelihoods, social justice, and health systems (Halawayhi, Fusheini, and Nunfam, 2026; Napogbong, Domapielle, and Derbile, 2021). To create an improved system of health delivery without negating the sustenance of generationally held knowledge and practices, this study relies on empirical data to examine the relationship between Fulbe traditional health systems and their implications for intergenerational learning and future health aspirations with emphasis on the socio-demographic determinant within a just transition framework.

Methods

The study premised on an exploratory principle, employed a mixed method approach to generate empirical data across selected sedentary and semi-sedentary nomadic Fulbe communities in Southern Ghana, precisely the Shai-Osudoku District. The location of Fulbe settlements and settlers were mapped out using existing map of the district, population data, and key informant information generated from community entry and transect walks. The district was zoned into four regions based on the distribution of Fulbe households, nomadic activities, and communal distribution. The uneven distribution of Fulbe settlers in the wider communities, the relatively secluded nature of Fulbe households in the communities and their physical location at the outskirt because of their initial land tenure agreement and extensive grazing field requirement made it difficult to apply rigid quantitative sampling approaches, hence the adoption of mixed and purposive approaches.

In all 650 individuals were surveyed across communities. Field data objective officers were trained to assist the research team in translating the tools in Fulfulde and help in the administration. Ethical clearance was sought from a review Board of the University of Ghana, and informed consent was received from each of the respondents in the study. Further in-depth interviews and ethnographic studies were also conducted. The quantitative data has been analysed and presented in the subsequent session of this paper.

Results

Table 1 presents the results of the frequency distribution of respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics. The mean age of respondents was 35.47 years (SD = 16.12). In terms of gender distribution, 51.54% of respondents were female, while 48.46% were male. Regarding educational attainment, 31.54% of respondents had no formal education, followed by those with Makranta education (25.08%). Smaller proportions had JSS (14.92%), SHS (11.69%), primary education (11.38%), tertiary education (4.77%), and non-formal education (0.62%).

With respect to employment status, the largest proportion of respondents were unemployed (25.54%), followed by herdsmen/pastoralists (24.31%) and traders/merchants (17.23%). Other categories included housewives/homemakers (9.23%), farmers (6.15%), teachers (2.15%), artisans/craftsperson (1.38%), and other occupations (14.00%). In terms of respondent category, the majority were parents (51.08%), followed by children (31.08%) and grandparents (16.46%), with a small proportion identified as caregivers/guardians (1.38%).

Most respondents were fully settled pastoralists (81.85%), while smaller proportions were nomadic (13.85%), sedentary (2.77%), and semi-sedentary (1.54%). Majority of respondents resided in rural areas (55.85%), followed by peri-urban (29.54%) and urban areas (14.62%). Regarding health insurance, 87.54% reported having a valid NHIS card, while 12.46% did not. Additionally, 68.77% of respondents had not received training on alternative livelihood activities, compared to 31.23% who had.

In terms of origin, 33.08% reported being from the same nationality as their current residence, while 32.00% were from Ghana. Other reported origins included Burkina Faso (14.77%), Niger (10.77%), Mali (4.77%), Nigeria (2.46%), and smaller proportions from Togo, Chad, Sudan, and other countries. Regarding migration generation, the largest proportion of respondents belonged to the third generation (32.31%), followed by second generation (28.46%), first generation (15.54%), and both fourth and fifth generations (11.85% each).

Table 1 :Frequency Distribution of Respondents’ Sociodemographic Characteristics (N = 650)

Variable

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Age 

Mean (SD) = 35.47 (16.12)

 

Gender 



Male

315

48.46

Female

335

51.54

Educational Level 



None

205

31.54

Primary

74

11.38

JSS

97

14.92

SHS

76

11.69

Tertiary

31

4.77

Non-formal

4

0.62

Makranta

163

25.08

Employment 



Unemployed

166

25.54

Herdsman/Pastoralist

158

24.31

Farmer

40

6.15

Trader/Merchant

112

17.23

Teacher

14

2.15

Housewife/Homemaker

60

9.23

Artisan/Craftsperson

9

1.38

Other

91

14.00

Respondent Category 



Grandparent

107

16.46

Parent

332

51.08

Child

202

31.08

Caregiver/Guardian

9

1.38

Type of Pastoralist 



Nomadic

90

13.85

Semi-sedentary

10

1.54

Sedentary

18

2.77

Fully settled

532

81.85

Place of Residence



Urban

95

14.62

Rural

363

55.85

Peri-urban

192

29.54

NHIS Card Ownership 



Yes

569

87.54

No

81

12.46

Training on Alternative Livelihood 



Yes

203

31.23

No

447

68.77

Origin 



Ghana

208

32.00

Mali

31

4.77

Togo

1

0.15

Burkina Faso

96

14.77

Nigeria

16

2.46

Niger

70

10.77

Chad

1

0.15

Sudan

1

0.15

Same as current nationality

215

33.08

Other

11

1.69

Migration Generation



First generation

101

15.54

Second generation

185

28.46

Third generation

210

32.31

Fourth generation

77

11.85

Fifth generation

77

11.85


Table 2 presents the results on Fulbe health indigenous knowledge and practices. For the statement that traditional Fulbe herbal medicine is more effective than orthodox medicine, 30.00% of respondents disagreed, while 19.69% strongly disagreed. In contrast, 18.92% agreed and 13.38% strongly agreed, with 18.00% remaining neutral. The mean score for this item was 2.76 (SD = 1.33).

Regarding trust in traditional healers as the most trusted healthcare providers, 31.54% of respondents agreed and 16.00% strongly agreed, while 29.38% disagreed and 7.69% strongly disagreed. A proportion of 15.38% reported neutral responses. This item had a mean score of 3.18 (SD = 1.23).

For the perception that traditional healing practices are superior to orthodox standards of care, 29.23% disagreed and 14.31% strongly disagreed, while 28.15% agreed and 12.46% strongly agreed. Neutral responses accounted for 15.85%, with a mean score of 2.95 (SD = 1.28).

For the perception that traditional healing practices are superior to orthodox standards of care, 29.23% disagreed and 14.31% strongly disagreed, while 28.15% agreed and 12.46% strongly agreed. Neutral responses accounted for 15.85%, with a mean score of 2.95 (SD = 1.28).

Concerning the statement that the traditional healing apprenticeship system prepares the younger generation, 30.77% agreed and 10.15% strongly agreed, whereas 28.62% disagreed and 13.38% strongly disagreed. Neutral responses constituted 17.08%, and the mean score was 2.96 (SD = 1.24). The overall mean score for Fulbe health indigenous knowledge and practices was 2.95 (SD = 1.00).


Table 2:Fulbe Health Indigenous Knowledge and Practices (N = 650)

Variable

Strongly Disagree 

n (%)

Disagree 

n (%)

Neutral n (%)

Agree n (%)

Strongly Agree n (%)

Mean

Traditional Fulbe herbal medicine is more effective than orthodox medicine

128 (19.69)

195 (30.00)

117 (18.00)

123 (18.92)

87 (13.38)

2.76 (1.33)

Traditional healers are the most trusted healthcare providers among Fulbe

50 (7.69)

191 (29.38)

100 (15.38)

205 (31.54)

104 (16.00)

3.18 (1.23)

Traditional healing practices are superior to orthodox standards of care

93 (14.31)

190 (29.23)

103 (15.85)

183 (28.15)

81 (12.46)

2.95 (1.28)

The traditional healing apprenticeship system prepares the younger generation

87 (13.38)

186 (28.62)

111 (17.08)

200 (30.77)

66 (10.15)

2.96 (1.24)

Total mean 

 

 

 

 

 

2.95 (1.00)

Table 3 presents the results on future health aspirations among Fulbe. A large proportion of respondents agreed (46.92%) or strongly agreed (43.38%) that technology can help preserve Fulbe health traditions for future generations, with minimal disagreement (2.92%) and strong disagreement (0.77%). The mean score for this item was 4.29 (SD = 0.77).

For the statement that traditional Fulbe medicine alone is not sufficient to resolve health issues, 31.38% agreed and 42.62% strongly agreed, while 11.08% strongly disagreed and 7.85% disagreed. Neutral responses accounted for 7.08%, with a mean score of 3.87 (SD = 1.33). Regarding the need for Fulbe healers to master both traditional and orthodox medicine, 43.69% agreed and 46.31% strongly agreed, with only small proportions disagreeing or strongly disagreeing. The mean score for this item was 4.33 (SD = 0.75).

For the perception that orthodox medicine complements traditional Fulbe medicine, 38.00% agreed and 30.77% strongly agreed, while 17.23% were neutral and smaller proportions disagreed or strongly disagreed. This item had a mean score of 3.83 (SD = 1.06). Finally, for the statement that positive healthcare behaviour should be measured by the coexistence and use of both systems, 48.77% agreed and 36.62% strongly agreed, with minimal disagreement. The mean score was 4.15 (SD = 0.86). The overall mean score for future health aspirations was 4.09 (SD = 0.63).


Table 3: Future Health Aspirations Among Fulbe (N = 650)

Variable

Strongly Disagree

 n (%)

Disagree

 n (%)

Neutral n (%)

Agree n (%)

Strongly Agree n (%)

Mean (SD)

Technology can help preserve Fulbe health traditions to future generation

5 (0.77)

19 (2.92)

39 (6.00)

305 (46.92)

282 (43.38)

4.29 (0.77)

Traditional Fulbe medicine alone is not sufficient to resolve health issues

72 (11.08)

51 (7.85)

46 (7.08)

204 (31.38)

277 (42.62)

3.87 (1.33)

Fulbe healers should master both traditional herbal medicine and orthodox medicine

2 (0.31)

19 (2.92)

44 (6.77)

284 (43.69)

301 (46.31)

4.33 (0.75)

Orthodox medicine complements traditional Fulbe medicine

15 (2.31)

76 (11.69)

112 (17.23)

247 (38.00)

200 (30.77)

3.83 (1.06)

Positive healthcare behaviour should be measured by coexistence and use of both systems

11 (1.69)

24 (3.69)

60 (9.23)

317 (48.77)

238 (36.62)

4.15 (0.86)

Total mean 

 

 

 

 

 

4.09 (0.63)

Table 4 presents the results of the multiple linear regression analysis examining factors influencing Fulbe peoples’ future health aspirations. Fulbe health indigenous knowledge and practices (β = -0.025, p = 0.278) and age (β = -0.004, p = 0.120) were not statistically significant predictors of future health aspirations. Gender was also not significantly associated with future health aspirations (β = -0.011, p = 0.850).

Among educational levels, tertiary education was positively associated with future health aspirations (β = 0.261, p = 0.030), while other educational categories were not statistically significant. In terms of employment status, none of the categories showed statistically significant associations at the 5% level, although the “other” category approached significance (β = -0.135, p = 0.082). Respondent category showed statistically significant associations, with parents (β = -0.436, p < 0.001), children (β = -0.465, p < 0.001), and caregivers/guardians (β = -0.419, p = 0.041) having lower coefficients relative to the reference category (grandparents). Among pastoralist types, being fully settled was positively associated with future health aspirations (β = 0.150, p = 0.025), while other categories were not significant.

Place of residence indicated that peri-urban residence was positively associated with future health aspirations (β = 0.268, p < 0.001), while rural residence was marginally significant (β = 0.122, p = 0.073). NHIS card ownership was not significantly associated (β = -0.041, p = 0.563). However, lack of training in alternative livelihood activities was negatively associated with future health aspirations (β = -0.131, p = 0.012). Regarding origin, respondents from Burkina Faso (β = 0.213, p = 0.005), Niger (β = 0.204, p = 0.019), and those reporting the same nationality (β = 0.531, p < 0.001), as well as “other” origins (β = 0.461, p = 0.007), showed statistically significant positive associations. Migration generation also showed significant associations, with second-generation (β = -0.229, p = 0.003) and third-generation respondents (β = -0.283, p < 0.001) having lower coefficients compared to first-generation respondents.

The overall model was statistically significant (F (39, 610) = 7.45, p < 0.001), explaining 32.3% of the variance in future health aspirations (R² = 0.323; Adjusted R² = 0.279).


Table 4: Multiple Linear Regression Analysis of factors influencing Fulbes’ Future Health Aspirations (N = 650)

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

95% CI

p-value

Fulbes’ Health Indigenous Knowledge and Practices

-0.025

0.023

[-0.071, 0.021]

0.278

Age

-0.004

0.003

[-0.009, 0.001]

0.120

Gender (Ref: Male)





Female

-0.011

0.059

[-0.128, 0.105]

0.850

Educational Level (Ref: None)





Primary

0.084

0.082

[-0.076, 0.245]

0.302

JSS

0.081

0.076

[-0.068, 0.229]

0.286

SHS

-0.031

0.087

[-0.202, 0.141]

0.727

Tertiary

0.261**

0.120

[0.025, 0.497]

0.030

Non-formal

-0.264

0.273

[-0.799, 0.272]

0.334

Makranta

0.083

0.059

[-0.034, 0.200]

0.163

Employment (Ref: Unemployed)





Herdsman/Pastoralist

0.127

0.078

[-0.027, 0.282]

0.105

Farmer

-0.089

0.104

[-0.293, 0.114]

0.390

Trader/Merchant

0.115

0.070

[-0.023, 0.253]

0.103

Teacher

0.028

0.160

[-0.286, 0.342]

0.862

Housewife/Homemaker

-0.108

0.088

[-0.281, 0.065]

0.221

Artisan/Craftsperson

0.063

0.194

[-0.319, 0.445]

0.746

Other

-0.135*

0.077

[-0.287, 0.017]

0.082

Respondent Category (Ref: Grandparent)





Parent

-0.436***

0.084

[-0.601, -0.270]

0.000

Child

-0.465***

0.124

[-0.708, -0.222]

0.000

Caregiver/Guardian

-0.419**

0.204

[-0.820, -0.018]

0.041

Pastoralist Type (Ref: Nomadic)





Semi-sedentary

0.056

0.183

[-0.303, 0.415]

0.760

Sedentary

0.051

0.146

[-0.235, 0.338]

0.725

Fully settled

0.150**

0.067

[0.019, 0.280]

0.025

Residence (Ref: Urban)





Rural Area

0.122*

0.068

[-0.012, 0.256]

0.073

Peri-Urban

0.268***

0.073

[0.125, 0.410]

0.000

NHIS Card Ownership (Ref: Yes)





No

-0.041

0.071

[-0.179, 0.098]

0.563

Alternative Training (Ref: Yes)





No

-0.131**

0.052

[-0.233, -0.029]

0.012

Origin (Ref: Ghana)





Mali

0.199*

0.110

[-0.016, 0.415]

0.070

Togo

0.632

0.546

[-0.439, 1.703]

0.247

Burkina Faso

0.213***

0.076

[0.063, 0.363]

0.005

Nigeria

0.238

0.157

[-0.071, 0.548]

0.130

Niger

0.204**

0.087

[0.034, 0.375]

0.019

Chad

0.125

0.544

[-0.944, 1.194]

0.819

Sudan

-0.059

0.545

[-1.128, 1.011]

0.914

Same nationality

0.531***

0.061

[0.412, 0.651]

0.000

Other

0.461***

0.171

[0.124, 0.797]

0.007

Migration Generation (Ref: First Generation)





Second Generation

-0.229***

0.077

[-0.381, -0.077]

0.003

Third Generation

-0.283***

0.080

[-0.441, -0.125]

0.000

Fourth Generation

-0.093

0.098

[-0.285, 0.100]

0.346

Fifth Generation

0.167

0.101

[-0.032, 0.366]

0.101


Discussion
Demographic Factors and Social Determinants

The results demonstrates that the Fulbe community, though appears to share similar characteristics, is not socially homogeneous. This can be seen from the dimensions of age, employment and economic viability, the nature of nomadism and settlement with 81.8% being settled pastoralist and 55.8% been in rural areas. The variation in nationality with 32% indicating Ghana as their nationality, 10.7% from Niger and others come from other countries in Africa also depicts their cross-border nature. Thus, the heterogeneity in the socio-demographic characteristics in Fulbe communities, and their intergenerational characteristics with 32.3% being third generational migrant and first generation constituting 15.5% augment the need to create a repository for the intergenerational learning related to health knowledge and future health aspirations.

The results demonstrates that the Fulbe community, though appears to share similar characteristics, is not socially homogeneous. This can be seen from the dimensions of age, employment and economic viability, the nature of nomadism and settlement with 81.8% being settled pastoralist and 55.8% been in rural areas. The variation in nationality with 32% indicating Ghana as their nationality, 10.7% from Niger and others come from other countries in Africa also depicts their cross-border nature. Thus, the heterogeneity in the socio-demographic characteristics in Fulbe communities, and their intergenerational characteristics with 32.3% being third generational migrant and first generation constituting 15.5% augment the need to create a repository for the intergenerational learning related to health knowledge and future health aspirations.


Fulbe Health Indigenous Knowledge and Practices

The perceived varied efficacy of traditional Fulbe medicines as shown in a disagreement of 30% and 19.6% strong disagreement, as contrasted with 31.5% of the respondents who trusted in traditional healers and 16% having strong trust in same create a lacuna that is still not resolved as there is an unsettled argument on the superiority of traditional Fulbe healing practices over orthodox medicine. Thus, Fulbe people still accept aspects of their traditional health system and orthodox health systems, hence the need to put in place measures for complementary adoption to achieve optimal health outcome.

The findings conform to other studies that have shown the pluralistic existence of traditional and orthodox medicine and how these impact on health seeking behaviour, early diagnosis, and case management (Kalu, 2022; Amzat, and Razum, 2014; and Sarfo, 2022). It is imperative to discuss this situation and examine its effect on future health aspirations.


Future Health Aspirations

In line with the examination of the determinants of future health aspirations, it was ascertained that though Fulbe indigenous health knowledge and age were not significant predictors, tertiary educational level, respondents' roles, type of settled nomadism and place of residence were key determinants. Thus, it is advanced that educational exposure, stage of migration (settled/semi-settled), and place of residence and place of origin have a positive relationship with future health aspirations. The observance of a positive relationship between migration generation, ranging from highest coefficients for first generation to third generations clearly shows the hope and aspirations in the future health of the Fulbe people in this study context.

Consequently, there is the need to enhance all components of both health systems perceived to lead to an improved health outcome and ensure the preservation and efficient transmission of aspects of Fulbe indigenous health knowledge that can enhance intergenerational learning in a just manner.


Conclusion

The study sought to examine the relationship between indigenous Fulbe health knowledge and practices and their implications on future health aspirations, with strong emphasis on selected socio-demographic determinants in the study context. Thus, the study has provided an empirical basis and knowledge for identifying the key factors that can facilitate intergenerational learning among an identified marginalized migrant group in a safe, friendly, sustained, and just transition continuum.


Reference

1. Amzat, J., & Razum, O. (2014). Medical pluralism: Traditional and modern health care. In Medical sociology in Africa (pp. 207-240). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

2. Finn, S., Herne, M., & Castille, D. (2017). The value of traditional ecological knowledge for the environmental health sciences and biomedical research. Environmental health perspectives, 125(8), 085006.

3. Halawayhi, Fusheini, and Victor Fannam Nunfam. "Socio-historical factors driving the integration of Fulani among the Nanumba in northern Ghana." Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (2026): 1-22

4. Head, L., Klocker, N., & Aguirre-Bielschowsky, I. (2019). Environmental values, knowledge and behaviour: Contributions of an emergent literature on the role of ethnicity and migration. Progress in Human Geography, 43(3), 397-415.

5.1 Kalu, U. N. (2022). Intergenerational knowledge transfer in traditional herbal medicine (THM) practices among the Igbo tribe in Nigeria: A qualitative study. The University of Regina (Canada).

6. Kohsaka, R., & Rogel, M. (2021). Traditional and local knowledge for sustainable development: Empowering the indigenous and local communities of the world. In Partnerships for the Goals (pp. 1261-1273). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

7. Konadu, Kwasi B. Indigenous medicine and knowledge in African society. Routledge, 2007.

8. Napogbong, L. A., Domapielle, M. K., & Derbile, E. K. (2021). Indigenous knowledge and community-based risk assessment of climate change among the Fulani Herder Community of Kpongu, North-Western Ghana. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(2), 484-501.

9. Redvers, N., Aubrey, P., Celidwen, Y., & Hill, K. (2023). Indigenous Peoples: Traditional knowledges, climate change, and health. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(10), e0002474.

10. Sarfo, I. (2022). Existing health seeking behaviour in the Eastern Region of Ghana: The role of traditional and orthodox health systems. European Journal of Medicine.

11. Thompson, K. O., & Fulton, J. (2024). Exploring the Perspectives of the Nomadic Fulani. Public Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Social Epidemiological Perspectives, 196.